home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1180 / 1180p017.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  87KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky | tree
OCR: feiture action was the court concluded, be- cause was filed less five years after the search of the premises or KIFNUFT 31. 1985, which uncovered the evidence on which the forfeiture was based Pet. App 30a. The court also held that the seizure 0 the property without prior notice Good and ar ppor- tunity be heard did not violate the Due Process Clause. at On Sept tember 26. 1990, the district court granted the United States motion for Eurmmary judgment. Pet. App 18a -22a The court coricluded that "based on the recovery of substantial amounts of drugs and drug instrumentalities, the United States had estab- lished probahle cause that the property was used t facilitate violation of 21 U.S.C. 841. and was there fore suhject to forfeiture. Pet. App. 2la. Under U.S.C. 1615 the burden then shifte ...